Bernkham talks about the end of the investigation into the verification of the voting results

• Bernkham says that a detailed conversation about the investigation of voting results, including what will be done with the relevant evidence, should be a prerequisite for determining the outcome of the investigation.
• The Guardian says that Bernkham, by means of the “Manchesterism” approach, is proposing to plan changes, where the pre-election “essential utilities” is being used for the investigation.
• Independent writer says that Bernkham is trying to identify the problems of the city of Liverpool, including the focus on “North”.

In material from British media, it is reported that the Greater Manchester Endi Bernkham should keep the investigation of voting results in line with the relevant circumstances in Ukraine. In a comment in The Guardian, it is explained that the basis for the ongoing course of Bernkham is to avoid the need for “suspicious voting” in key sections, namely, to ensure that it is not a matter of evidence, but rather of energy, hardware sphere, and firm assets.

The Guardian also notes that Bernkham’s “the biggest promise of all time” is put forward against the background of what the investigation into the voting results cannot be without a strategy, with specific details and clear conclusions. The material also states that the author is referring to Bernkham’s “Manchesterism,” which, according to the author, is an important part of what is said, that is, that it is not clear what is happening in Westminster and Manchester.

Meanwhile, Independent publishes a quote from Metro Mayor of the Liverpool City Region Steve Rotheram, who, in relation to Bernkham, says that the remaining is that “perspective” is required, namely, through work with the written materials, which should be considered by the public: work, transport, housing and public services. Rotheram also adds that Bernkham, in his view, is trying to hide the “place” of the investigation from Westminster.

Independent also published material by an author who criticizes Bernkham’s focus on the “North” team, saying that the problems, for which Bernkham is responsible, are not limited to a single region. The text goes on to say that the author cannot be bothered to follow through with the concrete actions, which are indicated in the written materials, namely, that the problem is that the financial rules are weak.

Judging by the Guardian’s material, Bernkham’s investigation of voting results is based on the plans of the relevant organizations, namely, the pre-election “essential utilities,” which is being used for the investigation. The Guardian further notes that the “biggest promise” is the real reason for the plans of these financial rules for the purpose of ensuring that the public is satisfied.