05 Aug 2026, 21:53
Judge vacates convictions in Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy case
- The judge vacated the convictions for seditious conspiracy that involved members of Oath Keepers after the U.S. Justice Department appealed the case.
- In a separate case, the court sentenced Stewart Rhodes to 2020 for his role in the armed takeover attempt at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.
- Prosecutors said the judge’s decision was based on a finding that the judge had relied on a critical error in the sentencing of the case’s defendants.
The federal court in the U.S. state of the case, presided over by Judge Amit Mehta, vacated convictions for seditious conspiracy involving members of the Oath Keepers group, which were handed down based on the verdict in the case tied to the Capitol attack on June 6, 2021. The court said it vacated the convictions after a request from the Justice Department. The U.S. judge said the sentence was vacated because the court found that the defendants’ actions did not meet the legal definition of the crime. The judge also cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2025, which the judge said required a change in the legal interpretation of the case.
The judge said, in particular, that the Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes was convicted for his role in the armed takeover attempt at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. The judge said it was necessary to vacate the convictions because the court’s decision “diminishes the gravity of that day, denigrates the work of the prosecutors and law enforcement officers who secured these convictions, and excuses criminal acts that caused a centuries-long pillar of our democracy — the peaceful transfer of presidential power — to buckle,” and also because “the court cannot write a different ending.”
In addition, the court said that Trump’s sentence was also overturned. The court said the decision involved 1,600 people, and that the number of defendants who were convicted and sentenced was 1,200. The court said the case involved 6 charges and that the convictions were overturned for 200 people.
In a separate part of the case, the Justice Department also said it would appeal the convictions involving members of the Proud Boys group for their role in the January 6 attack. The court said the Justice Department argued that the convictions should be overturned because the case was based on a legal interpretation that was later changed.
Tags: USA/Politics/Crime